3/9/2024 0 Comments I have imagej what is fijiI've been using Fiji on an Apple Silicon M1 (arm64) MacBook Pro (Big Sur 11.4) I’m clearly missing a step, and I’m wondering whether someone can help me figure out what it is / how to get this bundle to run using the native openJDK. However, when I click the Fiji.app, it still asks me to enable Rosetta. I presume brew is smart enough to install only a native JDK? I’ve installed openJDK with brew install openjdk. install a native JRE from brew or Azul.download Fiji-noJRE, which I have done, from here, and.I do not get any error messages or anything indicating why it won’t open. It downloads successfully but it fails to open. I recently received a new M1 Macbook Pro (2020) running MacOS 11.5 (Big Sur) from work and have been trying to download Fiji. I am attempting to use ImageJ for some image analysis for my work. So it really does not matter much how old the core installation is, as it can be updated online.Fiji not opening on M1 Macbook Pro (2020) Usage & IssuesĪpologies if this is the incorrect place and my poor wording of my problem as I am not the most tech savvy individual but I will do my best. Regarding updates, if you download a couple of years old Fiji installation you can just use the built-in updater for the plugins you need, also for the ImageJ 1.x layer. So there is really not any need to choose any fixed path just use the solution that fits your workflow best, and you can change it later. That goes the other way too nearly everything you develop for ImageJ 1.x will also work in Fiji. Nearly everything that works in Fiji will also work in ImageJ 1.x if you use Java 8 and include the dependency libraries. I work with materials technology, so I prefer to develop my workflow in ImageJ 1.x, and rather move the few plugins I need from Fiji over to my ImageJ 1.x based installation. It loads and runs much faster and is much simpler to use for a non-programmer, since you can just use the “Compile and Run” feature for plugins without any need to learn or understand an code-management system.Īlso, most of the plugins in Fiji were written for bio-sciences and have limited usefulness outside that field. I use both ImageJ 1.x and Fiji and by far prefer the former. Software is preferrably slim, but why choose an inferior piece of software just because it’s “slimmer”? Nobody is running this on a 20 year old machine anyway, saying “oh well, looks like I can only use the inferior ImageJ1 because I can’t be bothered updating to a machine only 15 years old I found on craigslist for free”. One or more software developers invest countless hours of precious time into it. I can’t really understand the “use ImageJ1 if you like slim software” argument. Why would anyone keep updating ImageJ1 (in fact it appears to be updated more frequently than Fiji, at the very least with stable public releases, Fijis latest one is almost TWO FRICKING YEARS OLD!)? Why not have ONE piece of software that includes everything someone might need? Is there anything in ImageJ1 that is not in ImageJ2? Or vince versa? If so, what is the excuse for the other piece of software not to include that new feature? Nowhere you can find information on the actual differences. Just starting with ImageJ and seriously confused.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |